abc-thinkbig

abc-thinkbig

over ABC-thinkBIG

ABC-thinkBIG is een persoonlijk website met artikelen, publicaties en links over leiderschap, bedrijfskundige aspecten én service georienteerde architectuur.

Scaling Agile, Method or Madness…., with figures

AgileGeplaatst door Mary Beijleveld do, mei 29, 2014 15:29:19

This is a blog about the 2 sessions Laurens and I hosted at Agile Coach Camp Denmark 2014.

At first it looks like it’s only about one session, but I sneakily pulled in the outcome of a second session, namely “The Awesome (Open Space) Session8R”. The outcome can be recognized by the number between the brackets. To save time… so you know… I provided you with a summary at the end of this blog.

Laurens and I wanted to do this workshop about agile scaling models. This was decided in 2 minutes of texting, only agreeing up on using my matrix of comparison I took from the ASK matrix and which I extended with aspects I think are important. As we learned before, a catchy title (1) always does wonders to the number of participants coming to a session..

Laurens came up with this title: “Scaling Agile, Methods or Madness”, which I lent to draw your attention to this blog post too.

Nils, a fellow participant also wanted to discuss agile scaling models, in particular differences / similarities between SAFe and scaledprinciples . We combined the two ideas at the start of the open space; the Market Place.

Just 30 minutes prior to the start of our session we decide about structure and stuff (2) and agreed up on adding a few elements of interaction (3). These were:

- asking what participant knew about scaling models,
- if they could add any method themselves that wasn’t on the list and
- some silent brainstorming
- I draw up some flip charts (4)
- Nils and I would present and Laurens, being a sketch note addict, would do all the writing (5)

We started discussing the 6 methods who are in the ASK matrix and discovered there are 2 more: scaledprinciples.org (made by the Germans) and POA ® (being: Plain Old Agile) which has a registered trademark as of may 24th .

-This trademark is claimed by Laurens & Ron, workers from to competing companies in the Netherlands (Xebia and Prowareness), which in itself is a awesome thing in my view –

So Laurens added the two extra methods to the flipcharts and we started asking / noting stuff like: what is it/ whose is it, the web link to materials. Then we discussed of the methods are low – middle – high on heaviness.

Only then we realized that 1 hour would be too short, giving the number of attendees and the fierce discussions. I suggested we do only three questions; the ones I think are the most important and which Jenny wanted to address too. These 3 questions were:

· What does it solve
· What works
· What smells

At that point Laurens took over… and proposed to dot vote (6) on the method we would like to do a silent brainstorm (7) for, by drawing only 2 dots per participant on any of the 8 methods.

As we were 19 participants, 38 dots were placed:

The 3 flipcharts I draw in advanced were turned into three new ones (of course again by Laurens) where we could stick our post-its upon. Each of us could write a maximum 2 post-its (8) for every questions on the 3 scaling methods that got the most dots: Less, Agile path and SAFe.

As we discovered we had adepts of the 3 methods in our midst and we asked (9) them to summarize what was said on the post-its.

A simple (10) count revealed that the methods with the most dots (SAFe) also got the most comments on the questions:

So we could easily conclude this method was hot topic in Agile-land. As a bonus and because we suddenly had a few minutes left; we asked all participant to write a post-it on which they could state what people / which role in a company would like each of the methods most:

· Who likes it

Take a way:

I wrote to the inventors of the ASK matrix (e.g. Steve Spearman at all.) : Knock, knock: Could be useful for adding to the matrix. smiley

All sum of sums you can find below:

Dot votes: 0 for SoS – scrum of scrums, 0 for scaledprinciples, 0 for plain old agile POA ®, 4 for “Spotify”, 5 for Disciplined Agile Delivery - DAD, 6 for Large Scale Scrum – LeSS,10 for Agile Path

And 13 dot votes for Scaled Agile Framework – SAFe. 38 in total.

Summary of comments

Solves:

LeSS ( 5 comments): way to combine lean, agile, TOC and systems thinking, agile thinking on large scale (up to Product owners level)

Agile Path (5 comments): stepwise structured change, management language and focus, better products

SAFe (10 comments): link strategy to development, buy-in at management level, shared backlog, separation of roles and responsibilities at all levels

What works:

Less (5 comments): its simplicity, it’s adoptable, you have choices, with lean, thru PO & feature teams

Agile Path (2 comments): agile capability matrix, high quality support by agilepath.com

SAFe (10 comments): clear connection to vision and strategy, alignment / inter team dependencies, easy to like by C-level, less change needed, big room planning

What smells:

LeSS (5 comments): topdown / big bang agile and lean transformation, perfect in theory/ hard in practice

Agile Path (6 comments): IT focused or initiated, no explanation how to do my job as manager, not broadly used yet

SAFe (16 comments): too prescriptive, can easily limit team and personal autonomy, legalizes companies "to do what they always did": command and control, money blurred vision.

Who likes it:

LeSS (8 comments): product – middle and other management, scrum solves all fanatics

Agile Path (4 comments): agile evangelists, toolbox fetishists, team and product owner, vendors

SAFe (7 comments): higher and portfolio managers, old school people, consultants, vendor.

As I mentioned in the beginning of this blog you can find some tips on how to make an awesome session of which Laurens did another session on: “The Awesome (Open Space) Session8R”with has a first subtitle: “Hung-over Ideation From the Trenches (by two bitter Snoring Vets)” and a sub-sub title “How to Come Up With a Legendary Session in 2 Minutes” Just follow the numbers inside the brackets.

Oh, I promised a summary/ list ;) well, here you are:

1. Structure: title, subtitle

2. Structure: who does what, time

3. Expectations: put in interaction

4. Recording / capturing: flipcharts, post-its, take a picture

5. Participation / visual knowledge exchange: Write on flipchart or whiteboard

6. Simplicity: dot vote

7. Simplicity: silent brainstorm (prevents groupthink)

8. Simplicity: restrain to maximum dots or post-its per question

9. Need help/ask participants to join/ summarize

10. Simplicity: count and draw conclusions from there.



  • Reacties(0)

Fill in only if you are not real





De volgende XHTML tags zijn toegestaan: <b>, <br/>, <em>, <i>, <strong>, <u>. CSS styles en Javascript zijn niet toegestaan.